Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,425
Abdussalaam v. The State of Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Petitioner: Munir-Ibn Sami Abdussalaam
Respondent: The State of Virginia, Amherst County Adult Detention Center and Appomattox Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cotton v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff: Gary W. Cotton
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Working
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff: Walter Ferguson
Defendant: John Working
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00364
Plaintiff: Hunter Dixon
Defendant: Wallens Ridge State Prison, J. Artrip, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00366
Plaintiff: Shavis Holloman
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullins et al
as 7:2024cv00365
Plaintiff: Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant: Dr Mullins, CO Johnson, C/O Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Petitioner: Michael Maurice White
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia and Craig W. Stallard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff: Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant: G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Defendant: Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?