Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
United States of America v. Approximately Up to $15034663 in Funds Contained in Ten Bank Accounts We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00806
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately Up to $15034663 in Funds Contained in Ten Bank Accounts , All Funds Contained in USAA College Savings Plans Account 4801 and Account 4802, All Funds Contained in Fidelity Investment Accounts 4560 and 7910 and others
Intervenor_defendant: American International Services
Claimant: Trissie Kae Cox and Ashley Speck
Movant: Michael Taylor
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. $62,330.51 in U.S. Funds, Acct# 10018867 in the name of Larry C./ Jennifer L. Jones at Bank of Fayette County, Piperton, TN, et al et al
as 2:2011cv02449
Defendant: $62,330.51 in U.S. Funds, Acct# 10018867 in the name of Larry C./ Jennifer L. Jones at Bank of Fayette County, Piperton, TN, et al and Jimmy R. Leslie,Jr.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Larry C. Jones , Jennifer L. Jones , Bank of Fayette County and others
Miscellaneou: FBI and Kemper Durand
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Artis et al v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01091
Movant: Taylor Artis and Edward Douglas, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
United States of America v. Currency $83,492.95 et al
as 2:2011cv11564
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $83,492.95 and Vehicle 2008 Bentley Coupe, VIN: SCBDR33W58C052956
Claimant: Dwayne Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Counterfeit Merchandise and Proceeds from Sales of Counterfeit Merchandise, Including: et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv03054
Plaintiff: United States of America and Shelley Xue Hua Lin
Defendant: Counterfeit Merchandise and Proceeds from Sales of Counterfeit Merchandise, Including, Approximately 4,426 Articles of Counterfeit Merchandise from L&J Fashion Company, 2585 Taylor St., San Francisco, CA, Approximately 4,581 Articles of Counterfeit Merchandise from New CWK Gift, 2655 Taylor St., San Francisco, CA and others
Claimant: Huamin Wu Mei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL PROPERTY WITH PARCEL ID NUMBER 08366-000, TAYLOR COUNTY, FLORIDA WITH ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES THEREON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00489
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: REAL PROPERTY WITH PARCEL ID NUMBER 08366-000, TAYLOR COUNTY, FLORIDA WITH ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES THEREON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL PROPERTY WITH PARCEL ID NUMBER 01719-000, TAYLOR COUNTY, FLORIDA WITH ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES THEREON
as 4:2009cv00490
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: REAL PROPERTY WITH PARCEL ID NUMBER 01719-000, TAYLOR COUNTY, FLORIDA WITH ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES THEREON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Real Property Taylor, Michigan
as 2:2009cv12831
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Taylor, Michigan
Claimant: Robert W Bopp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States America v. Currency $247,265.75 et al
as 2:2009cv12122
Plaintiff: United States America
Defendant: Currency $247,265.75, Currency $1,139, Currency $359 and others
Claimant: Alvin Taylor and Andrea Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $129,107.00 in U. S. Currency
as 2:2009cv03902
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 119,107.00 in US Currency, Donna Taylor and James Taylor
Claimant: James Taylor and Donna Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?