Cases 1 - 4 of 4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 3740 YADKINVILLE ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS LOTS 25 AND 26, BLOCK "C," WINSTON SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
as 1:2014cv00666
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
3740 YADKINVILLE ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS LOTS 25 AND 26, BLOCK "C," WINSTON SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Approximately $295,798.42 in United States Funds
as 3:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $295,798.42 in United States Funds
Claimant:
T&C Equipment, Lor Enterprises, Inc., Teng Lor and others
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 500 RIVERVIEW BOULEVARD, ALSO KNOWN AS LT 35, BLK C, LINWOOD FARMS OF THE RIVERVIEW ACRES, LEXINGTON, COTTON GROVE TOWNSHIP, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS TH
as 1:2011cv00311
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
500 RIVERVIEW BOULEVARD, ALSO KNOWN AS LT 35, BLK C, LINWOOD FARMS OF THE RIVERVIEW ACRES, LEXINGTON, COTTON GROVE TOWNSHIP, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS TH, $214,731.70 IN FUNDS FROM PRUDENTIAL ANNUITY ENDING IN 8265, IN THE NAME OF GARY L. COX, $12,230.38 IN FUNDS FROM BB&T ACCOUNT ENDING IN 2072, IN THE NAME OF GARY L. COX AND BO COX and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VANGUARD GROUP ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4897 et al
as 1:2007cv00081
Defendant:
VANGUARD GROUP ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4897, VANGUARD GROUP ACCOUNT ENDING IN 3597, VANGUARD GROUP ACCOUNT ENDING IN 7326 and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant:
ROBERT HARRISON, Shamrock, LLC, HARRISON AMUSEMENT COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
