Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. 2019 Dodge Challenger R/T
as 1:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2019 Dodge Challenger R/T
Claimant:
Ally Bank and Quintania Gregg
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $10,345.00
as 5:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $10,345.00 Seized From The Following Locations Within Friends Mart, Zebulon, North Carolina, $4,430.00 in the Blue Money Bag in Drawer in Office, $1,348.00 in a BB&T Money Bag with NCEL Markings in Drawer in the Office and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $7,796.15 Seized from the Following Locations Within T and D Mart, Raleigh, North Carolina: (1) $177.15 in Quarter Pusher Machines (2) $877.00
as 5:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
VARIOUS AMOUNTS OF U.S. CURRENCY TOTALING $7,796.15 SEIZED FROM THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS WITHIN T AND D MART, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Goodman's Personal Property et al
as 5:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Goodman's Personal Property, RTP Federal Credit Union Account, State Employees Credit Union Accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Approximately $295,798.42 in United States Funds
as 3:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $295,798.42 in United States Funds
Claimant:
T&C Equipment, Lor Enterprises, Inc., Teng Lor and others
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1605 MOUNT WILLING RD., EFLAND, ORANGE COUNTY, NC, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
as 1:2012cv00833
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
1605 MOUNT WILLING RD., EFLAND, ORANGE COUNTY, NC, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Interested_party:
STEPHEN WAYNE JOHNSON and AUDREY T. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 500 RIVERVIEW BOULEVARD, ALSO KNOWN AS LT 35, BLK C, LINWOOD FARMS OF THE RIVERVIEW ACRES, LEXINGTON, COTTON GROVE TOWNSHIP, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS TH
as 1:2011cv00311
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
500 RIVERVIEW BOULEVARD, ALSO KNOWN AS LT 35, BLK C, LINWOOD FARMS OF THE RIVERVIEW ACRES, LEXINGTON, COTTON GROVE TOWNSHIP, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS TH, $214,731.70 IN FUNDS FROM PRUDENTIAL ANNUITY ENDING IN 8265, IN THE NAME OF GARY L. COX, $12,230.38 IN FUNDS FROM BB&T ACCOUNT ENDING IN 2072, IN THE NAME OF GARY L. COX AND BO COX and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $153,385.41 in United States Currency
as 7:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$153,385.41 in United States Currency Seized From BB&T Bank Account Number XXXXXX5793 Held in the Name of Village Inn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$81,153.58 in United States Currency Seized From BB&T Bank Account Number ******7653 Held in the Name of Richard Stone d/b/a Stones Fast Save and $130,446.68 in United States Currency Seized From BB&T Account Number ******6119 Held in the Name of Billy Stone t/a Minute Stop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VANGUARD GROUP ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4897 et al
as 1:2007cv00081
Defendant:
VANGUARD GROUP ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4897, VANGUARD GROUP ACCOUNT ENDING IN 3597, VANGUARD GROUP ACCOUNT ENDING IN 7326 and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant:
ROBERT HARRISON, Shamrock, LLC, HARRISON AMUSEMENT COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
