Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
USA v. Approx. $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account et al
as 2:2024at00217
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account and Approximately $230,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account
Claimant: Daniel Stewart and Luke Burroughs
USA v. Approx. $1,697,930.94, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024mc00090
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account and Approximately $230,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account
Claimant: Daniel Stewart and Luke Burroughs
USA v. Approx. $6,700.00 in U.S. Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024mc00012
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $6,700.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Daniel Paiz
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Smith & Wesson 556 Caliber Semi-Automatic Rifle, Model: MP 15, Serial Number: SZ29316 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00133
Defendant: Glock, 9 Caliber Pistol, Model: GMBH 26, Serial Number: BDWG453, Smith & Wesson 556 Caliber Semi-Automatic Rifle, Model: MP 15, Serial Number: SZ29316, Glock, 9 Caliber Pistol, Model: GMBH 19, Serial Number: BERZ060 and others
Claimant: Richard Lopez, Jr. and Daniel Zavala, Jr.
Plaintiff: United States of America
USA v. Approximately $6,420.00 in U.S. Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00110
Defendant: Approximately $6,420.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Daniel Estes and Matthew Tobiasz
United States of America v. Approximately $7,800.00 in U.S. Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018mc00061
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $7,800.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
USA v. Real Property located at 10170 Patti Way, Elk Grove, California, Sacramento County, APN: 132-0910-069-0000 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00763
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property located at 10170 Patti Way, Elk Grove, California, Sacramento County, APN: 132-0910-069-0000, Real Property located at 4960 Francesca Street, Elk Grove, California, Sacramento County, APN: 117-1000-033-0000, Real Property located at 19460 Fiddletown Road, Fiddletown, California, Amador County, APN: 021-050-019-000 and others
Claimant: Daniel Zhu , Jinquan Li , Lone Oak Fund, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Approximately $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02358
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $14,000.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $13,020.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Alyssa Valley and Dean Daniels
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2013 Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4, VIN: ZHWEC1476CLA01032, Bangkok Plate Number: 4 Kor Kai Tor Tung et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00967
Defendant: Alexandre Cazes, 2013 Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4, VIN: ZHWEC1476CLA01032, Bangkok Plate Number: 4 Kor Kai Tor Tung, Porsche Panamera S, VIN: WP0ZZZ97ZGL040783, Bangkok Plate Number: 5 Kor Kai Tor Tung and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Martin Cazes, Danielle Heroux, KGYJ Management Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Approximately $227,555.00 in U.S. Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01204
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $227,555.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $294,191.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Daniel Munoz Acosta and Ruby Delgadillo
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?