Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,347
United States of America v. $509,573.00 in Bank Funds
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff: United State of America and United States of America
Defendant: $509,573.00 in Bank Funds and 509,573.00 In Bank Funds
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Valdez v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Valdez
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Home Materials Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: New Home Materials, Inc. and New Home Materials Inc.
Defendant: United States of America and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
United States of America v. All Funds Held in Escrow by Clyde and Co. In The United Kingdom as Damages or Restitution in Petrosaudi v. PDVSA Uncitral Arbitration
as 2:2020cv08466
Defendant: ALL FUNDS HELD IN ESCROW BY CLYDE & CO. IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AS DAMAGES OR RESTITUTION IN PETROSAUDI V. PDVSA UNCITRAL ARBITRATION and All Funds Held in Escrow by Clyde and Co. In The United Kingdom as Damages or Restitution in Petrosaudi v. PDVSA Uncitral Arbitration
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party: PetroSaudi Oil Services (Venezuela) Ltd. and Clyde & Co LLP
Claimant: Clyde and Co LLP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. Approx. $70,000.00 seized from Chase Bank account number 9343714245 et al
as 2:2023mc00301
Plaintiff: United States and United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $70,000.00 seized from Chase Bank account number 9343714245, Approximately $38,582.49 seized from TD Ameritrade account number 756-362930, Approximately $3,061.65 seized from Wells Fargo Bank account number 6214166578 and others
United States of America v. 762,201.48 Seized From U.S. Bank Account No. 8773 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01829
Defendant: $961,136.43 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. '0383, $397,883.73 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. '1199, $762,201.48 Seized From U.S. Bank Account No. '8773 and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: Khaled J. Al-Sabah
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. Straw We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01164
Defendant: Francis Edward Straw and Frank Straw
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
United States of America v. Certain Rights To and Interests In Shares of Series D Preferred Stock in Palantir Technologies Featured Case
as 2:2017cv04446
Defendant: Certain Rights To and Interests In Shares of Series D Preferred Stock in Palantir Technologies
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Tarek Obaid
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
In Re: Return of Funds Seized by the United States of America and Identified as Asset IDs 23-FBI-000004, 23-FBI-000005, 23-FBI-000006, 23-FBI-000007, and 23-FBI-000008
as 3:2023cv00646
In Re: In Re: Return of Funds Seized by the United States of America and Identified as Asset IDs 23-FBI-000004, 23-FBI-000005, 23-FBI-000006, 23-FBI-000007, and 23-FBI-000008
Plaintiff: Finest City Escrow, Inc.
Defendant: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
United States of America v. Approximately 69,370 Bitcoin (BTC), Bitcoin Gold (BTG) Bitcoin SV (BSV) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07811
Defendant: Approximately 69,370 Bitcoin (BTC), Bitcoin Gold (BTG) Bitcoin SV (BSV) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
Plaintiff: United States of America
Respondent: Ross William Ulbricht
Intervenor: Adesijuola Ogunjobi and Nobuaki Kobayashi
Claimant: Caleb Bradberry, Mr. Roman Hossain, Lucas E Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?