Cases 131 - 140 of 281
Ahmad et al v. EGL, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02199
Defendant:
EGL, Inc. and CEVA Freight, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shahid Ahmad , Tabresh Begg , Tauheed Begg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khan v. Suleman et al
as 2:2016cv05117
Plaintiff:
Maryum Khan
Defendant:
Javaid Suleman and Rana Suleman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mehmood
as 1:2016cv04676
Defendant:
Mazher Awan, Matloob Khan, MINHAS Construction Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Nasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Siddique v. Waltco Metal Incorporated et al
as 1:2016cv23314
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Siddique
Defendant:
Waltco Metal Incorporated, Waltco Metal Recycling Inc., Danilo Cacace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khan et al v. VIP III Daycare Center Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03968
Defendant:
Damaris Cedeno, Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Marium Khan and Maria Zarate
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Samuel Arenzana et al v. EGL, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv03953
Plaintiff:
Samuel Arenzana , Eliod Barron , Felipe Burga and others
Defendant:
EGL, Inc. and CEVA Freight, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khan v. Houston Burger Restaurants LLC #3
as 4:2016cv02058
Plaintiff:
Tracy Khan
Defendant:
Houston Burger Restaurants LLC #3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Proano v. Kakar, et al
as 5:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Wilson Fernando Proano
Defendant:
Tahir Kakar , Pankaj Rasiklal Parmar , Javed A. Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cabrera v. Stephens et al
as 1:2016cv03234
Plaintiff:
Ines Cabrera
Defendant:
Attaullah Khan and Christopher Stephens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Cabrera v. Stephens et al
as 2:2016cv03234
Plaintiff:
Ines Cabrera
Defendant:
Attaullah Khan and Christopher Stephens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
