Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Barrows et al v. Brinker Restaurant Corporation
as 5:2019cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael Mendez and Savannah Barrows
Defendant:
Brinker Restaurant Corporation and Brinker Restaurant Corporation doing business as Chili's Grill & Bar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Smith v. NJ Labor Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00774
Defendant:
Hayden S Alexander, NJ Labor Solutions LLC, Anson Barrow and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cassidy et al v. Industrial Electric & Controls, LLC
as 0:2018cv62706
Plaintiff:
Carl Tirone, Tony Barrow, Justin MCINTOSH and others
Defendant:
Industrial Electric & Controls, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Svetlick et al v. PR Local Electric, Inc.
as 0:2018cv61285
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick , John Loveless , James Boylan and others
Defendant:
PR Local Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Barrow v. Triple P.G. Sand Development, L.L.C.
as 4:2018cv00963
Plaintiff:
Karri Barrow
Defendant:
Triple P.G. Sand Development, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Head v. Barrow County
as 2:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Colleen Head
Defendant:
Barrow County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Summerlin v. Barrow
as 4:2017cv01016
Defendant:
Robert W Barrow
Plaintiff:
Dale H Summerlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrow v. Medacta USA, Inc.
as 1:2017cv09162
Plaintiff:
Marisa Barrow
Defendant:
Medacta USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Acevedo v. United States Railroad Retirement Board et al
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Acevedo
Defendant:
United States Railroad Retirement Board , Walter A Barrows , Steven J Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrows v. The Hoffman Commerical Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2017cv80614
Plaintiff:
Lisa Barrows
Defendant:
The Hoffman Commercial Group, Inc. and BBX Sweet Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
