Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. Crossfit Hardbodies, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv14304
Plaintiff:
Robert W Davis
Defendant:
Crossfit Hardbodies, LLC , Edson Santos and Fortune Santos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Melo v. Volpe Liquors, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv21019
Plaintiff:
Edson Melo
Defendant:
Volpe Liquors, Inc. and Anthony Volpe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Denson et al v. FFAM, Inc.
as 9:2010cv80542
Plaintiff:
April B. Denson , Terri L. Dunmore , Tomeiko Evans and others
Defendant:
FFAM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
BOLAND et al v. EDSON MARSH CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 1:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , JOHN FLYNN , HENRY KRAMER and others
Defendant:
EDSON MARSH CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Archila v. J & D Welding, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00048
Plaintiff:
Edson Archila
Defendant:
J & D Welding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robles v. Camacho et al
as 5:2008cv00993
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Robles
Defendant:
Edson Camacho and Osvaldina Lima
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Robles v. Camacho et al
as 5:2008cv00997
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Robles
Defendant:
Edson Camacho and Osvaldina Lima
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Burgos v. Brisa Design Consultants, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv22615
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Burgos
Defendant:
Brisa Design Consultants, Inc. and Edson De Araujo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cahn et al v. C H Robinson Worldwide Inc
as 5:2007cv00776
Plaintiff:
Richard Cahn, Matthew Carter, William Horne and others
Defendant:
C H Robinson Worldwide Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
