Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Fox v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02805
Plaintiff: Brandon Fox
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN et al v. FOOT LOCKER, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv04268
Plaintiff: HALLIE BROWN , DAVID CHEATHAM, JR. , ERIC GUZMAN and others
Defendant: FOOT LOCKER, INC. and FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown et al v. Foot Locker Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02731
Plaintiff: Hallie Brown , David Cheatham, Jr. , Eric Guzman and others
Defendant: Foot Locker Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KENNEDY v. FOOT LOCKER, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03590
Plaintiff: DAMITA KENNEDY
Defendant: FOOT LOCKER, INC. , FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC. and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kennedy v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00570
Plaintiff: Damita Kennedy
Defendant: Foot Locker, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eric Guzman v. Foot Locker Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv07410
Defendant: Does, Foot Locker Inc and Foot Locker Retail Inc
Plaintiff: Eric Guzman
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Eric Guzman v. Foot Locker Inc et al
as 5:2010cv01496
Defendant: Does, Foot Locker Inc and Foot Locker Retail Inc
Plaintiff: Eric Guzman
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Dick v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
as 0:2010cv60041
Plaintiff: Mickhel Dick
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dotten v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv01124
Plaintiff: Bruce Dotten and Bruce Dotten
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc., Foot Locker Specialty, Inc. and Foot Locker Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Type: Labor Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?