Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Dayton Building & Construction Trades Council et al v. School District of the City of Dayton, Ohio
as 3:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
Dayton Building & Construction Trades Council , Richard Matheson and Thomas E Orendorf, Jr.
Defendant:
Board of Education of the School District of the City of Dayton, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01178
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Van Kempen v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
Roy Van Kempen
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riedel et al v. L-Raphael FS NYC, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10212
Plaintiff:
Vincent Riedel and Li Wei Jin
Defendant:
L-Raphael FS NYC, Inc., Ronit Raphael, Kimberley Matheson Shedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams et al v. Walgreen Co
as 4:2014cv02761
Plaintiff:
Henry Adams , Worvell Ray Aldridge , Harry Aubrey, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salvador Carrillo v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05657
Defendant:
Jeremiah Berlinger, Does, Robert Junkin and others
Plaintiff:
Salvador Carrillo
Larry Ambriz et al v. Matheson Tri-Gas
as 2:2014cv04546
Plaintiff:
Larry Ambriz, Salvador Carrillo, Randall Courtney and others
Petitioner:
Marco A Chavez and David Cintat
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas
Ambriz et al v. Matheson Tri-Gas
as 3:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
Larry Ambriz , Salvador Carrillo , Marco A Chavez and others
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Best v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
as 8:2013cv02858
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Matheson v. Gamestop, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01812
Plaintiff:
Alex Matheson
Defendant:
Gamestop, Inc. and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
