Cases 11 - 20 of 20
City Furniture, Inc. et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 0:2017cv61683
Plaintiff:
City Furniture, Inc. and City Furniture Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant:
Maximo Gonzalez , Lyan Ruiz and Nike Ruiz Sitzman
Cross_claimant:
Lyan Ruiz and Nike Ruiz Sitzman
Cross_defendant:
Lyan Ruiz , Nike Ruiz Sitzman and Maximo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Omran Hamid v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00600
Defendant:
Does, R.J Hill, Rianna Marie Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Omran Hamid
Hamid v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00599
Defendant:
Does 1 to 200, inclusive, Rianna Marie Lopez and Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Omran Hamid
Nettles v. Nike USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06100
Plaintiff:
Jerald Nettles
Defendant:
Nike USA, Inc. and Nike retail Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Patel v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv04781
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Payal Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRANKLIN v. NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2014cv01136
Plaintiff:
JAIME FRANKLIN
Defendant:
NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv01508
Plaintiff:
Isaac Rodriguez
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patel v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00851
Plaintiff:
Payal Patel
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larios v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01600
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alejandro Larios
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nike, Inc. v. Best Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04598
Defendant:
Best Systems, Inc., Judy Dee and Various John Does, Jane Does and XYZ Companies
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
