Cases 11 - 20 of 44
STEVENSON v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00159
Defendant:
Professional Transport, Ronald Romain, PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HOMAN v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00169
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., Ronald Romain and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Plaintiff:
Rory Homan
KUBERSKI v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00168
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., Ronald Romain and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Plaintiff:
Larry Kuberski
BOYD v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00160
Defendant:
Ronald Romain, PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Plaintiff:
Frederick Boyd
COFFEY v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Coffey
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
MARINO v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Shawn Marino
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
HOOD v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
Warkedra Hood
Defendant:
Ronald Romain, PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
ANCRUM v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00156
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ANCRUM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burke v. Professional Transportation, Inc
as 2:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Burke
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UNITED PROFESSIONAL & SERVICE EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL 1222
as 3:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED PROFESSIONAL & SERVICE EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL 1222
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
