Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Caye v. Staples, Inc.
as 9:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Peter C. Caye
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ronald Stillman, et al v. Staples Inc
as 09-4072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STILLMAN FLSA PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAPLES INC
Ronald Stillman, et al v. Staples Inc
as 09-3871
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STILLMAN FLSA PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellant:
STAPLES INC
Brabody v. Staples, Inc.
as 4:2009cv04534
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brabody, Lisa Brabody and Lisa Brabody
Defendant:
Staples, Inc., Staples, Inc. and Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Soto, Jr. v. Staples Inc
as 2:2009cv02482
Plaintiff:
Elminio Soto, Jr.
Defendant:
Staples Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Morrison et al v. Staples, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01970
Plaintiff:
Omar Morrison, Omar Morrison, Omar Morrison and others
Defendant:
Staples, Inc, Staples, Inc, Staples, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ciotti v. Staples Inc.
as 2:2009cv01919
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CIOTTI, JEFFREY CIOTTI and JEFFREY CIOTTI
Defendant:
STAPLES INC., STAPLES INC. and STAPLES INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Price v Staples, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01890
Plaintiff:
Christopher Price, Christopher Price and Christopher Price
Defendant:
STAPLES, INC., STAPLES, INC. and STAPLES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Sharma v. Staples, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01891
Plaintiff:
Vishal Sharma and Vishal Sharma
Defendant:
STAPLES, INC. and STAPLES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ZELINSKY et al v. STAPLES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01889
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ZELINSKY, ROBERT ZELINSKY, ROBERT ZELINSKY and others
Defendant:
STAPLES, INC. and DOES 1 TRHOUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
