Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Black v. Roth et al (PLR2)
as 1:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Lester Black
Defendant:
Christopher Roth and Kelly Roth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Class A Security
as 2:2016cv03007
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Class A Security
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Starnes v. Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC (TV3)
as 2:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Christopher Starnes
Defendant:
Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cozart v. Dish Network Service Corporation
as 3:2016cv00894
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Cozart
Defendant:
Dish Network Service Corporation and Echosphere, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Craig v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Craig, Wesley Waldrop, John Phillip Werner and others
Defendant:
Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (TV2) and Ruby Tuesday, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Chapman et al v. Abernathy
as 1:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Chapman , Terrance Anderson , Ellis Ball and others
Defendant:
Talmage L Abernathy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alexander v. Kellogg USA, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02049
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alexander
Defendant:
Kellogg USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Salehe et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
Sam Salehe , Juan Aponte , Nathan Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spakes et al v. National Strategic Protective Services, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Tommy Spakes , Alvin Arnwine , Daniel Barnes and others
Defendant:
National Strategic Protective Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Salehe et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc. (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
Sam Salehe , Juan Aponte , Nathan Baldwin and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
