Cases 21 - 30 of 467
National Labor Relations Board v. Atlantic Veal & Lamb LLC et al
as 1:2023mc01130
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Atlantic Veal & Lamb LLC and Ohio Farms Packing Co. LLC
Zak Shimose v. ILWU, Local 142, et al
as 23-15612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZAK SHIMOSE
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION, LOCAL 142, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
National Labor Relations Board v. Nichols
as 5:2023mc00051
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Angela Nichols
NLRB v. IBN Construction Corp
as 22-3111
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Defendant / Appellant:
IBN CONSTRUCTION CORP
Not Yet Classified:
LABORERS EASTERN REGION ORGANIZING FUND
National Labor Relations Board v. Atlantic Veal & Lamb LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02880
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Atlantic Veal & Lamb LLC and Ohio Farms Packing Co. LLC
National Labor Relations Board v. Smith
as 3:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
James Garland Smith
National Labor Relations Board v. Young
as 2:2023cv02051
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Tomica Young
Drew-King v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 22-3182
Petitioner:
Kathy Drew King, Regional Director of Region 29 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Matthew Denholm v. ADT, LLC
as 22-6116
Not Yet Classified:
MATTHEW T. DENHOLM, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and ADT, LLC
Matthew Denholm v. ADT, LLC
as 22-6115
Not Yet Classified:
MATTHEW T. DENHOLM, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board and ADT, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
