Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Mercier et al v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Mercier, Charles A. Mercier, Gerald L. Mayes and others
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ennis v. ITT Corporation et al
as 6:2008cv03339
Plaintiff:
Earl Jackson Ennis
Defendant:
ITT Corporation, ITT Corporation, Pure-Flo Precision Disability Plan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lehar v. ITT Corporation et al
as 6:2008cv03271
Plaintiff:
Michael D Lehar
Defendant:
ITT Corporation, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Hara v. ITT Industries Inc., Plan Administrator et al
as 6:2008cv06121
Plaintiff:
Patricia O'Hara
Defendant:
ITT Industries Inc., Plan Administrator and ITT Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lee v. ITT Industries, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Preston T. Lee
Defendant:
ITT Industries, Inc., ITT Industries, Inc., John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Tanaka v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1260 (AFL-CIO) et al
as 1:2007cv00289
Plaintiff:
Norman K.E.K. Tanaka
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1260 (AFL-CIO), ITT Industries, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Barnett v. ITT Educational Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv00459
Plaintiff:
Vicki Barnett
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc., ITT Educational Services, Inc., Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gorski v. ITT Long Term
as 07-1063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANET R. GORSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
ITT LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
