Cases 41 - 50 of 1,712
Pension Fund of Cement Masons' Union Local No. 502 et al v. Aztec Cement Company Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06116
Plaintiff:
Pension Fund of Cement Masons' Union Local No. 502, Cement Masons Local 502 and Plasterers Area 5 Annuity Fund, Cement Masons Institute, Local 502 Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Aztec Cement Company Inc. and Jorge Torrez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. KEM Artifex, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02308
Plaintiff:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, Terry Nelson, Finishing Trades Institute and others
Defendant:
KEM Artifex, LLC, Larry Anderson and Michelle Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. J. and J. Glass Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, International Painters and Allied Trades Annuity Plan, Terry Nelson and others
Defendant:
J. and J. Glass Corporation a New Jersey Corporation doing business as Snow's Glass & Mirror Company, Joanne Debruycker doing business as Snow's Glass & Mirror Company, John Debruycker doing business as Snow's Glass & Mirror Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Roofers' Pension Fund et al v. Allied Waterproofing, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05555
Plaintiff:
Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Allied Waterproofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Burgess
as 1:2023cv02216
Plaintiff:
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, International Painters and Allied Trades Annuity Plan, Terry Nelson and others
Defendant:
Scott Burgess doing business as SPB Painting and Scott Burgess individually and doing business as SPB Painting
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. Perrygreen Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv06028
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Perrygreen Ltd., Randy Perry and Sciame Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund et al v. Groundworks Contracting, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02598
Plaintiff:
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund, Mark Johnson, Chad Goldschmidt and others
Defendant:
Groundworks Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. Gravity Construction, Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv05572
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Gravity Construction, Corp., Navdeep Singh, Ashnu International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund et al v. Zade Trucking, LLC
as 3:2023cv02545
Plaintiff:
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund, Mark Johnson, Chad Goldschmidt and others
Defendant:
Zade Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. MR. 4TH OF JULY CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 1:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
MR. 4TH OF JULY CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
