Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Willis et al v. City of Hot Springs, Arkansas et al
as 6:2013cv06144
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Willis and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 2842
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs, Arkansas , David Watkins and Denny McPhate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callahan v. Walnut Ridge Arkansas, City of
as 3:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jason Callahan
Defendant:
Walnut Ridge Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Douglas v. Jacksonville, City of
as 4:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Gene Douglas
Defendant:
Jacksonville, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Young v. Traditional Bakery Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dylan Joseph Young
Defendant:
Traditional Bakery Inc and Oklahoma City Bakery Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Norris v. City of Hot Springs et al
as 6:2012cv06135
Plaintiff:
Paul Norris
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs and David Flory
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Moss et al v. Crestpark Dewitt LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Moss , Lillie Mae Sanders , Vernice Woods and others
Defendant:
Crestpark Dewitt LLC , Crestpark Forrest City LLC , Crestpark Wynne LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Freeman v. Little Rock, City of
as 4:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Donald Freeman
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 825
Blevins et al v. Plainview, City of
as 4:2012cv00280
Plaintiff:
Brian Blevins and Michael Shepard
Defendant:
Plainview, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mitchell v. Wynne, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00836
Defendant:
Wynne, City of and Jeff Sanders
Plaintiff:
Jason D Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terry et al v. Ola, City of
as 4:2011cv00645
Plaintiff:
Robert Terry and John Stafford
Defendant:
Ola, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
