Cases 41 - 48 of 48
MOSNER v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv06166
Plaintiff:
JANET MOSNER
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC , LOWE'S, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
REGANATO v. APPLIANCE REPLACEMENT INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06164
Plaintiff:
ARLENE REGANATO
Defendant:
APPLIANCE REPLACEMENT INC. , JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BUCKLEY et al v. UNION COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv02579
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BUCKLEY and RYAN WILSON
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY , UNION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT , JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Curtbert v. Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv60479
Plaintiff:
Stephen Curtbert
Defendant:
Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc., John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. PARTNERS PHARMACY, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv03956
Plaintiff:
DONNA BROWN
Defendant:
PARTNERS PHARMACY, LLC , SOLUTIONS, LLC, CARE , JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MCDEVITT v. VIRTUA HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2013cv05131
Plaintiff:
DOLORES MCDEVITT
Defendant:
VIRTUA HEALTH, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Pascullo et al v. Merril Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01116
Plaintiff:
Dominick J. Pascullo and Raymond Gonzales
Defendant:
Merril Lynch & Co., Inc., Merril Lynch &Co. Inc, Plan Investment Committee, Merril Lynch & Co. Inc. Plan Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wachovia Corporation Employee Benefit Plan v. Amaker et al
as 3:2007cv03328
Plaintiff:
Wachovia Corporation Employee Benefit Plan and Wachovia Corporation Employee Benefit Plan
Defendant:
Daniel Amaker, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
