Cases 41 - 50 of 142
Ellingsen et al v. M&M Bedding, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03177
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellingsen and Sherry Orban
Defendant:
M&M Bedding, LLC, Mohamed R. Maghari and Jeffrey M. Mowrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Payamps et al v. M & M Convenience Deli & Grocery Corp.
as 1:2016cv04895
Plaintiff:
Joel Collado and Ricardo Payamps
Defendant:
M & M Convenience Deli & Grocery Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Malone v. M&M Diversified, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
M&M Diversified, Inc., Marc Buyers and Abee Buyers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Arnold v. Genghis Grill et al
as 4:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Courtnie Arnold
Defendant:
Genghis Grill, Genghis Grill International, LLC, Genghis Grill Franchise Concepts, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Quizhpi v. M&M Construction and Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05725
Plaintiff:
Jose Quizhpi
Defendant:
M&M Construction and Development, Inc. and Marcin Slizak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burris et al v. M&M Bedding, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jason Burris , Thomas Lee Fox, Jr. and Anthony Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
M&M Bedding, LLC , Mohamed R. Maghari and Jeffrey M. Mowrey
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
M v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv01401
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
R. M. and M. M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Castillo v. M & M Pizza Corp., et al
as 1:2016cv00755
Defendant:
M & M Pizza Corp. and Mohamed Nassar
Plaintiff:
Miguel Castillo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eldridge v. M & M Property Management et al
as 0:2016cv60179
Plaintiff:
Omar Eldridge
Defendant:
M & M Property Management, Kirit Bhalani, Maulik Bhalani and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Eldridge v. M & M Property Management et al
as 6:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Omar Eldridge
Defendant:
M & M Property Management, Kirit Bhalani and Maulik Bhalani
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
