Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 675
John Baleja v. Northrop Grumman Space and Mission Systems Corp., et al
as 22-56042
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN BALEJA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE AND MISSION SYSTEMS CORP. SALARIED PENSION PLAN, NORTHROP GRUMMAN BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION and others
Aracich v. The Board of Trustees of The Employee Benefit Fund
as 22-2544
Plaintiff / Appellant: Matthew Aracich
Defendant / Appellee: The Board of Trustees of The Employee Benefit Funds of Heat & Frost Insulators Local 12, The Employee Benefit Funds of Heat & Frost Insulators Local 12, The Board of Trustees of The Pension Fund of Heat And Frost Insulators Local 12 Plan and others
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, et al. v. MILLER et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Plaintiff: ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PRUDENTIAL MERGED RETIREMENT PLAN and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant: DENNIS E MILLER, ESTATE OF ELIZABETH M. MILLER, THOMAS B GOSSETT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Aviation West Charters, LLC v. SutterSelect Plan Administration Committee et al
as 3:2022cv03601
Plaintiff: Aviation West Charters, LLC doing business as Angel MedFlight
Defendant: SutterSelect Plan Administration Committee and Sutter Bay Operating Unit Self-Funded Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Molla v. Gerdau Ameristeel, US, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02094
Plaintiff: Grant Molla
Defendant: Gerdau Ameristeel, US, Inc. and Gerdau Benefits Plans Administrative Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Caterpillar Inc., as Plan Administrator and fiduciary of the Caterpillar Inc Employee Health, Life and Disability Benefit Program and Caterpillar Inc Retiree Benefit Program v. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv04732
Plaintiff: Caterpillar Inc., as Plan Administrator and fiduciary of the Caterpillar Inc Employee Health, Life and Disability Benefit Program and Caterpillar Inc Retiree Benefit Program
Defendant: Jacqueline Baker and Krentz Loran Hodge & Masur PC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
COOK v. PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LOCAL UNION 197 OF TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA MONEY PENSION PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE PLAN et al
as 2:2022cv00291
Plaintiff: APRIL COOK
Defendant: PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LOCAL UNION 197 OF TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA MONEY PENSION PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE PLAN and PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LOCAL UNION 197 OF TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA MONEY PENSION PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Abel, Christine et al v. CMFG Life Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00449
Plaintiff: Christine Abel, Steven Auld and David Pennington
Defendant: CMFG Life Insurance Company, The Board of Trustees of CMFG Life Insurance Company, The Employee Benefit Plan Administration Committee of the CUNA Mutual 401(K) Plan for Non-Represented Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Winston Anderson, et al v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al
as 22-16268
Plaintiff / Appellant: WINSTON R. ANDERSON and CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, INTEL RETIREMENT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE INTEL CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Walsh v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00849
Plaintiff: Martin J Walsh
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc., Plan Administration Committee, Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?