Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Dingle, Jr. v. Entenmann's/Bimbo Bakeries USA
as 2:2013cv03913
Plaintiff:
Robert Dingle, Jr.
Defendant:
Entenmann's/Bimbo Bakeries USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ISOM v. Bimbo Bakeries Usa, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv60504
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE Z ISOM
Defendant:
BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. and TONY MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tyrone Smith v. Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01689
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Smith
CZERWINSKI v. STROEHMANN & MAIERS et al
as 3:2011cv02976
Plaintiff:
WALTER CZERWINSKI
Defendant:
STROEHMANN & MAIERS , BIMBO BAKERIES USA , BAKERY DRIVERS AND SALESMAN LOCAL 701 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Miller v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
Leslie Miller
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. , Mark McSweene and Tim Muck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
William Bullock v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, et al
as 10-3276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM C. BULLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
BIMBO BAKERIES USA INC and ANGIE LASHOMB
SCOTT et al v. BIMBO BAKERIES USA
as 2:2010cv03154
Plaintiff:
QUINN F. SCOTT , RONALD SOCHACKI , WILLIAM J. DAVENPORT, III and others
Defendant:
BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. and BIMBO FOODS BAKERIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Susan Mora v. Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc et al
as 2:2010cv03748
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Susan Mora
Bullock v. Bimbo Bakeries USA et al
as 1:2009cv01902
Plaintiff:
William C. Bullock
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries USA and Angie LaShomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Solorzano v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01666
Plaintiff:
David Solorzano, Jr.
Defendant:
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. and Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
