Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Riley v. Xpress Courier Services Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Brandon Riley
Defendant:
Xpress Courier Services Inc , John W Yarbrough and Michael Southall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hicks v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Edith Davis Hicks
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Chavez v. Montes et al
as 5:2014cv05337
Plaintiff:
Zulema Chavez
Defendant:
Edgar Montes , La Huerta, Inc., John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Wright's Glass Co., L.L.C., et al
as 4:2014cv04110
Plaintiff:
John Johnson
Defendant:
Wright's Glass Co., L.L.C., Wright's Glass Co, #2, L.L.C., Lorie Page and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan et al v. Big E Foods Inc et al
as 4:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
Sean Jordan , Allie Burke , Deontre Lamb and others
Defendant:
Big E Foods Inc and Charles Erle Hammans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nixon et al v. ETS Oilfield Services LP et al
as 4:2013cv00726
Plaintiff:
Cory Nixon , John Kirby and Lane Chapman
Defendant:
ETS Oilfield Services LP , Devin Nevilles and Joe Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander et al v. Tutle and Tutle Trucking Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander , Bennie Collumb , Don Davis and others
Defendant:
Tutle and Tutle Trucking Inc , Tommy Paul Tutle and Gary Tutle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reed v. Healthscope Benefits Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Antonio Reed
Defendant:
Healthscope Benefits Inc , John Does and Shirley Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Estes v. PAM Transportation Services Inc et al
as 5:2013cv05199
Plaintiff:
Dianna Estes
Defendant:
PAM Transport Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Chasko et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 5:2013cv05191
Plaintiff:
Christine Chasko , Byron Banks , Matthew Barrett and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
