Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Martinez v. Tsunami, Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jordyn Martinez
Defendant:
Tsunami, Incorporated and Joseph Kovera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walsh v. Martinez, et al
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor and Martin J. Walsh
Respondent:
Eddie Martinez, an individual, and Cut Rite Lawn Care and Maintenance, Inc., an Indiana Company, Eddie Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walsh v. Martinez, et al
as 2:2022mc00065
Petitioner:
Martin J. Walsh
Respondent:
Eddie Martinez and Cut Rite Lawn Care And Maintenance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez Lopez v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC
as 3:2019cv00914
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC
Plaintiff:
Victor Martinez Lopez and Victor E Martinez Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fml
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
GONZALES MARTINEZ et al v. HOG SLAT, INC.
as 2:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
LUIS A. FLORES, JOSE L. GONZALES MARTINEZ, NENSON HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
HOG SLAT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nunez et al v. Indiana Department of Child Services
as 2:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
Arlene Nunez and Veronica I Martinez
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCCLESKEY et al v. MARTINEZ
as 1:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY
Defendant:
BETTIE S. MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
