Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Henderson v. North Texas Acquisition Group, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Kyler Henderson
Defendant:
North Texas Acquisition Group, LLC, Beau S. Gumbert and Jake B. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Matthews v. Top Tier, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01241
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Matthews
Defendant:
Fredric B. Robinson and Top Tier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 Fair Labor Standards Act - Maximum Hours
ROBINSON v. ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2016cv09058
Plaintiff:
SALADEEN B. ROBINSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charly J Netel et al v. Lisa Netel et al
as 8:2011cv01935
Defendant:
Darren T Barker, Ronald R Camhi, Steven Casselberry and others
Plaintiff:
Charly J Netal CPA and Charly J Netel
Robinson et al v. Stevenson Bros. Hardwood Flooring Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00807
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Robinson and Denise R. Robinson
Defendant:
Stevenson Bros. Hardwood Flooring Inc., Joshua Stevenson and Michael Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Robinson et al v. Stevenson Bros. Hardwood Flooring Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Robinson and Denise R. Robinson
Defendant:
Stevenson Bros. Hardwood Flooring Inc., Joshua Stevenson and Michael Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
RUSSELL v. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2007cv02212
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RUSSELL
Defendant:
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, ANN MCLAUGHLIN KOROLOGOUS, SIDNEY HARMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Robinson v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2007cv00817
Plaintiff:
Winnie B. Robinson
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
