Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MANSOUR et al v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2024cv06178
Plaintiff:
Norhan Mansour and Omar Polanco
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor STEVEN M. FULOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
SCHECHTER v. CLEAN TEAM, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02343
Petitioner:
Colleen Breslin, REGIONAL DIRECTOR SUZANNE SULLIVAN and ERIC R SCHECHTER
Not Classified By Court:
SHERYL M. GOSKI
Respondent:
CLEAN TEAM, INC. and THETA HOLDINGS COMPANY, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
SULLIVAN v. SERV BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
as 3:2022cv04336
Petitioner:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR SUZANNE SULLIVAN and SUZANNE SULLIVAN
Defendant:
SERV BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
SEIBERT et al v. NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv20478
Plaintiff:
PAUL M. SEIBERT, THOMAS F. SOLURY, DANA MOLINEAUX and others
Defendant:
NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, NOKIA 401(K) COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RITORTO et al v. KPMG, LLP et al
as 2:2021cv19330
Plaintiff:
MARC J RITORTO, HILTON HEE CHONG, PAUL J. BURROUGHS and others
Defendant:
KPMG, LLP, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KPMG, LLP, THE KPMG PENSION STRATEGY AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MILANO et al v. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS U.S. CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv17793
Plaintiff:
RODNEY HERGENRADER, CHARLES VAN HOOSER, MARK MILANO and others
Defendant:
THE 401(K) INVESTMENT COMMITTEE OF COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS U.S. CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-30, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS U.S. CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
LUENSE et al v. KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06827
Plaintiff:
NEIL ROSE, DANIEL F SETTNEK, PAMELA PEARSON and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC., KONICA MINOLTA 401(K) PLAN COMMITTEE, SUSAN MCCARTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
SILVA et al v. EVONIK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv02202
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SILVA, RHONDA ALLEN, STEHLE HARRIS and others
Defendant:
EVONIK CORPORATION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF EVONIK CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GIDDENS v. THE CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2019cv21743
Defendant:
THE TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE DIRECTOR SHEILAH COLEY, OFFICER SHEILA TATAREK and others
Plaintiff:
RAVEENA GIDDENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTENSE v. TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY PENSION FUND et al
as 2:2014cv03590
Plaintiff:
VALENTINE ORTENSE
Defendant:
TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY PENSION FUND , BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY PENSION FUND , KINGSWAY TRANSPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
