Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lee v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01353
Defendant:
Sang Keon Lee and ZZIM USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ms. Soon Ja Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rodgers v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Taryechia Rodgers
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc. doing business as Nestle USA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tate, et al v. EventMakers-USA, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Trina Tate, Brittany Hutchinson and Morgan Hutchinson
Defendant:
EventMakers-USA, Inc. doing business as CVAH Productions doing business as IAH Productions, Lawrence A. Creeger and Matthew Allan Creeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Dech v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Harriett Dech
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cho v. Joong and Daily News Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01062
Plaintiff:
Janice Cho
Defendant:
Joong and Daily News California, Inc., Joong and Media Network USA, Inc, Joong and Daily News Washington, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Canonico v. Anton Paar USA, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Danielle Canonico
Defendant:
Anton Paar USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Griffin v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00917
Plaintiff:
Bernice B. Griffin
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steele v. Topgolf USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00655
Plaintiff:
Christopher Steele
Defendant:
Topgolf USA, Inc. and Topgolf USA Kingstowne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrack v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
as 3:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Keith Barrack
Defendant:
Philip Morris USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
