Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Soto et al v. Vitran Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03811
Plaintiff:
Saul Soto , Gustavo Dominguez and Gonzalo Dominguez
Defendant:
Vitran Express, Inc. and Joseph Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
REPPERT v. VITRAN EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 5:2013cv03248
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. REPPERT
Defendant:
VITRAN EXPRESS, INC. and BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hines v. Vitran Express, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02773
Plaintiff:
Scorone C. Hines
Defendant:
Vitran Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Torres v. Vitran Express, Inc.
as 4:2012cv02349
Plaintiff:
Alexander Torres
Defendant:
Vitran Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Brandon Campbell, et al v. Vitran Express, Inc.
as 12-56250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON CAMPBELL, individually and on behalf of members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved employees pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act [PAGA] and RALPH MALDONADO, individually and on behalf of members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved employees pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act [PAGA]
Defendant - Appellee:
VITRAN EXPRESS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation
Brandon Campbell v. Vitran Express, Inc.
as 12-55052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANDON CAMPBELL, individually and on behalf of members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved employees to the Private Attorney General ACT (PAGA)
Defendant - Appellant:
VITRAN EXPRESS, INC.
Brandon Campbell et al v. Vitran Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv05029
Plaintiff:
Brandon Campbell and Ralph Maldonado
Defendant:
Does and Vitran Express, Inc.
Brandon Campbell et al v. Vitran Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04442
Plaintiff:
Brandon Campbell and Ralph Maldonado
Defendant:
DOES and Vitran Express, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
