Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 156,094
Deveney v. Owen et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Susan Deveney
Defendant: Elizabeth Owen and Katherine Ko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Novitski v. Airbnb, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01205
Plaintiff: Ashleigh Novitski
Defendant: Airbnb, Inc., J & P Tropical Inc. and Patrizia Emanuela Bissi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Guihur-Coln et al v. UBER Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff: Max V. Guihur-Coln and Hannah Guihur-Coln
Defendant: UBER Technologies, Inc., Rasier LLC, UBER Puerto Rico, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01209
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Llabres-Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2024cv01206
Plaintiff: Waleska Llabres-Morales
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gutierrez-Calderon v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2024cv01208
Plaintiff: Yesika Gutierrez-Calderon
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Number Assigned
as 24-1439
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: LUIS ANGEL RAMOS-CORDERO
OTTMAR v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff: KERSTIN OTTMAR
Defendant: UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cameron B v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff: Cameron Blevins
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. Newton
as 24-1452
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: FAITH NEWTON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?