Cases 91 - 100 of 523
Nelson H Romero v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2021cv00324
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Offcier B. Keil, City of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Nelsom H Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00305
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arturo Rubinstein et al v. The Keshet Inter Vivos Trust et al
as 2:2021mc00131
Defendant:
The Keshet Inter Vivos Trust, Yoram Yehuda and Sharona Yehuda
Plaintiff:
Fab Rock Investments, LLC, Arturo Rubinstein and Oceanside Mile, LLC
Miles Evans v. City of Newport Beach et al
as 2:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
Miles Evans
Defendant:
City of Newport Beach, Doe Officer and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miles Evans v. City of Newport Beach et al
as 8:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Doe Officer, City of Newport Beach and Does 1 through 100
Plaintiff:
Miles Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stewart Manago v. M. Martinez et al
as 5:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Vanderkallen, D. Godoy, Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ponce v. Sheela, et al.
as 2:2020cv02537
Plaintiff:
Pablo Jesus Ponce
Defendant:
Clay, Sheela, House of Acts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 5:2020cv08615
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sally Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clayco Construction CO., Inc. v. Miles Construction Group, Inc.
as 5:2020mc00053
Defendant:
Miles Construction Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clayco Construction CO., Inc. and Clayco Construction CO., Inc. doing business as Clayco Inc.
Devon Miles et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv10460
Plaintiff:
Devon Miles and James Driscoll
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
