Cases 91 - 100 of 100
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. BB Wolf's et al
as 4:2008cv00324
Defendant:
BB Wolf's and Michael Conrad Larson
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Amacker et al v. Renaissance Asset Management LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00481
Plaintiff:
William E. Amacker, Lindy R. Bianchi, Stan Chow and others
Petitioner:
Joseph Irastorza and Raul Morales
Defendant:
Renaissance Asset Management LLC, Anthony Michael Ramunno, MAN FINANCIAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Larson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv03506
Plaintiff:
Joe S. Larson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Farouk Systems, Inc. v. Larz Inc et al
as 4:2007cv03383
Plaintiff:
Farouk Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Larz Inc, Mark Larson, Amy Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Morgan v. Larson et al
as 4:2007cv00454
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Morgan, Jr
Defendant:
Donna Larson, Shane Greenlee, Unknown Accountant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Staples et al
as 6:2007cv00205
Plaintiff:
Justin Larson
Defendant:
Janice Staples, Cloey Chancey, George W Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. LTD Financial Svc, et al
as 4:2004cv01644
Plaintiff:
Constance Williams, Lana K. Harris, Vicki Lynn Shephard and others
Defendant:
LTD Financial Services I Inc and LTD Financial Services LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
