Cases 91 - 100 of 129
Billy Asemani v. Ali Rafsanjani, et al
as 09-55616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant - Appellee:
ALI AKBAB HASHEMI RAFSANJANI, Former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Head of the Islamic Republic's Council of Guardians; In Their Individual/Personal Capacities and MUHAMMAD KHATAMI, Former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran; In Their Individual/Personal Capacities
Asemani v. Webster
as 1:2009cv00999
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Asemani v. Ahmadinejad
as 1:2009cv03565
Plaintiff:
Billi G. Asemani
Defendant:
Mahmood Ahmadinejad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Asemani v. Warden
as 1:2009cv00949
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00611
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Asemani v. Ahmadinejad
as 1:2009cv00878
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
Mahmood Ahmadinejad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Asemani v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2009cv00261
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Gary D. Maynard, J. Michael Stouffer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Asemani v. Chronister et al
as 1:2009cv00238
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
Chronister, Parks, Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Billy Asemani v. S. Smith
as 09-6167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant - Appellee:
S. SMITH, Case Management Specialist, TYLER, Captain, Mailroom Supervisor, KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden, ECI-East and others
Billy Asemani v. Lois Fisher
as 09-6097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant - Appellee:
LOIS I. FISHER, Chief Attorney, NANCY SUSANNE FORSTER, Chief Public Defender and COLLATERAL REVIEW DIVISION OF THE OPD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
