Cases 91 - 100 of 655
NEWMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03761
Plaintiff:
JOHN NEWMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HAND v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv03692
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
JEHU HAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03504
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
KIDD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv03343
Plaintiff:
CARLOS KIDD
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03241
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
DAVID HALL CRUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTGOMERY v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv03214
Plaintiff:
LISA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, WILLIAM P. BARR, MICHAEL CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BRADIN et al v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv03104
Respondent:
JACKSON, HOLST, WILBURN and others
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ROSS, RAYMOND GAJEWSKI, SCOTT HOWIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03031
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SAMPLE et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv02959
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SAMPLE PLC, BRANDON SAMPLE, ESQ. and BRANDON SAMPLE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
