Cases 91 - 100 of 101
Californians For Renewable Energy v. California Public Utilities Commission
as 3:2008cv01954
Plaintiff:
Californians For Renewable Energy, Californians For Renewable Energy, Californians For Renewable Energy and others
Defendant:
California Public Utilities Commission
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Cbeyond Communications, LLC, et al
as 08-15716
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, DBA AT&T California
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, MICHAEL R. PEEVEY, DIAN M. GRUENEICH and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
CBEYOND COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
CBEYOND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ("CBEYOND")
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. CPUC, et al
as 08-15568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, DBA AT&T California
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, MICHAEL R. PEEVEY, DIAN M. GRUENEICH and others
Amicus Curiae:
CBEYOND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ("CBEYOND")
Connecticut Department of Publ v. FERC
as 07-1375
Petitioner:
Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
New England Power Pool Participants Committee, NRG Power Marketing, Inc., Connecticut Jet Power, LLC and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Maine Public Utilities Commission, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and Richard Blumenthal
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Organization of MISO States, Inc., California Public Utilities Commission and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and The Electric Power Supply Association
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv04145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sacramento Municip. Util. Dist v. FERC
as 07-1208
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, Independent Energy Producers Association, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
City and County of San Francisco, California, Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation District and others
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. The California Public Utilities Commission et al
as 3:2007cv01797
Plaintiff:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company and others
Defendant:
The California Public Utilities Commission, Michael R. Peevey, Dian M. Grueneich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sprint Corp v. FCC, et al
as 02-1129
Petitioner:
Sprint Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
SBC Communications Inc., People of the State of California, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Cingular Wireless LLC
PUC of State of CA, et al v. FERC
as 01-71934
Petitioner:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Petitioner-Intervenor:
TRANSALTA ENERGY MARKETING (CALIFORNIA), INC.
Intervenor:
MIRANT AMERICAS ENERGY MARKETING, LP, NEVADA POWER COMPANY, SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY and others
:
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
US Telecom Assn, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1012
Petitioner:
United States Telecom Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc., Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
AT&T Corporation, Covad Communications Company, Network Access Solutions Corp. and others
Terminated Party:
US WEST Communications, Inc., NorthPoint Communications, Inc., MCI WorldCom, Inc. and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
