Cases 91 - 100 of 442
Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano, Linda Meiborg and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sparks v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv02776
Petitioner:
Terrence Sparks
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
DAVID JONES
Respondent:
DAVID MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00820
Plaintiff:
Meadors, Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Mitchell v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01348
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crawford v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jared R. Crawford
Defendant:
Jayson Clark, Kenny Shires, Harrisburg Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Pelt v. Mitchell
as 2:2022cv02097
Petitioner:
Ronald M Van Pelt
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleveland v. Blum et al
as 3:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Richard Cleveland
Defendant:
Bob Blum, Percey Myers, Christine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobbins v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv01041
Petitioner:
Angelo Cobbins
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05216
Plaintiff:
DAVID MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
