Cases 91 - 100 of 166
Oppenheimer v. Brafford
as 1:2018cv00368
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Kevin Brafford dba Crossfit NoDa and Kevin Brafford
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer vs Mountain Area Health Education Center, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00361
Defendant:
Mountain Area Health Education Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Bennett et al
as 1:2018cv00342
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Margaret Bennett and Steve Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Oppenheimer et al v. Crain Communications, Inc.
as 1:2018cv10014
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer and Performance Impressions LLC
Defendant:
Crain Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Oppenheimer v. Storrow et al
as 1:2018cv00297
Defendant:
Joel Leslie Storrow, McGill Associates, P.A., WR-Martin, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer and David Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Goldklang Group, The et al
as 2:2018cv02691
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Goldklang Group, The and South Carolina Baseball Club LP
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Griffin et al
as 1:2018cv00272
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Jennifer Fowlkes Griffin and James Sean Griffin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 1:2018cv00257
Defendant:
Digital South Media Group LLC, Robert E Somes, Christopher Wotell and others
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Kenney
as 1:2018cv00252
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Daniel Christopher Kenney
Petitioner:
Daniel F. Kenney
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer et al v. Vertical Systems Analysis Inc.
as 1:2018cv05330
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer and Performance Impressions LLC
Defendant:
Vertical Systems Analysis Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
