Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KAUR v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2009cv02550
Plaintiff:
PARVINDER KAUR
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, MICHAEL AYTES, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
MINARD RUN OIL COMPANY et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv00125
Plaintiff:
MINARD RUN OIL COMPANY, PENNSYLVANIA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION, ALLEGHENY FOREST ALLIANCE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, ABIGAIL R. KIMBELL, KENT B. CONNAUGHTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00986
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
CAGGIANO v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009mc00071
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CAGGIANO
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MARK J. KAPPELHOFF
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00749
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00366
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DIAKHITE v. DECKER et al
as 2:2009cv00550
Petitioner:
MOUNA DIAKHITE
Respondent:
THOMAS R. DECKER, JAMES T. HAYES, JR., JOHN P. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
