Cases 91 - 100 of 274
ROBERTS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2018cv09928
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ROBERTS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv09199
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, R. GALLOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv08674
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN PARKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
REDD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv07679
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VINCENT REDD
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VIOLETTE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2018cv03401
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ , DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAHER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2018cv02348
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE E. MAHER
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BELT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv13582
Plaintiff:
JERRY RAY BELT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NORTHEAST REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LEINHEISER v. HOEY et al
as 1:2017cv11642
Plaintiff:
NOE LEINHEISER
Defendant:
T. HOEY, D ALATORY, NEWBURY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv10865
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE GORE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN F.C.I. FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv09415
Plaintiff:
William Ulyssess Robinson
Defendant:
USA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
