Cases 91 - 100 of 2,027
County of Harris v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45677
Defendant:
Arun Sharma, Abbott Laboratories, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Illinois Union Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
County of Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Hilton v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2017op45178
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Hilton
Intervenor Defendant:
Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Van Wert County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45571
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Van Wert County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Van Wert v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op46345
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Van Wert
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pleasant Valley School District v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021op45120
Plaintiff:
THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PLEASANT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT THE and Pleasant Valley School District
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTCAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
San Leandro Unified School District v. Cephalon, Inc.,et al
as 1:2021op45114
Plaintiff:
San Leandro Unified School District, a local education agency
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,, ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
as 1:2017md02804
Defendant:
National Prescription Opiate Litigation, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Toledo, City of Lorain, County of Cuyahoga and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Allergan Finance LLC, HBC Service Company, Discount Drug Mart, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Webb County, TX and others
Intervenor:
USA Today, Chicago Tribune Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Special Master:
Francis McGovern, David Rosenblum Cohen and Cathy Yanni
Respondent:
Linda Singer and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jane Does, Pfizer Inc., King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Counter Claimant:
Christopher C. Smith and James Coomer
Not Classified By Court:
State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Amicus Curiae:
Manatee Memorial Hospital, Allegiance Health Center of Ruston, Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and others
Petitioner:
Paul Andrew Pyfer, David B. Gustin, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Harris County Hospital District v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2021op45096
Plaintiff:
Harris County Hospital District doing business as Harris Health System
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Harris County Hospital District v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv01450
Defendant:
Arun Sharma, Abbott Laboratories, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Harris County Hospital District d/b/a Harris Health System and Harris County Hospital District doing business as Harris Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Sarasota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 8:2018cv00859
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Sarasota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
