Cases 91 - 100 of 470
Magee v. Errington
as 3:2020cv00101
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Joshua Demien Magee
Respondent:
Superintendent Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rasheed v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Anthony G. Beasley, Joshua Csaszar, Andrew C. Mills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Akeem Abdullah Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carruthers v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Walter Tremaine Carruthers
Defendant:
Joe McDonald, Mark Cossit, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00294
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Thompson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00980
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joe Edward Thompson, Jr.
Mixon v. Errington
as 3:2019cv00899
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Superintendent Joe Errington
Plaintiff:
Darryl Mixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rucker v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00901
Plaintiff:
Mario Terrell Rucker
Defendant:
Anthony Beasley, Pelicia Hall, Joshua Csaszar and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton v. Errington et al
as 1:2019cv00840
Defendant:
Laura Tilley, Pelicia Hall, Timothy Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Meika DeSean Britton
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00796
Defendant:
Medical Staff of LCDF, Billy Sollie, Melissa McCarter and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Romero Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Reed et al
as 1:2019cv00194
Plaintiff:
Monroe Randle
Defendant:
Joe Errington, Regina Reed and Katherine Blount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
