Cases 91 - 100 of 882
Witherspoon v. Ozmint et al
as 0:2010cv01089
Plaintiff:
Willie A Witherspoon
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Willie Eagleton , Doris Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kershaw v. Padula et al
as 6:2010cv00951
Plaintiff:
Devin Jamaal Kershaw
Defendant:
Anthony J Padula, Jon Ozmint, Bruce Oberman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pelzer v. McCall et al
as 8:2010cv00914
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pelzer
Defendant:
Michael McCall , Jon Ozmint , Cecil Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. SC Dept of Corr et al
as 1:2010cv00865
Petitioner:
Roy Allen Roberts
Respondent:
SC Dept of Corr and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. SC Dept of Corr et al
as 0:2010cv00865
Petitioner:
Roy Allen Roberts
Respondent:
SC Dept of Corr and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cobb v. Johnson et al
as 0:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Calvin J Cobb
Defendant:
Robert Johnson, Sgt Epps, Officer Simons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Ozmint et al
as 4:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
Birthan Johnson
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Robert Ward, Bernard McKie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Blakely v. Ozmint et al
as 4:2010cv00718
Plaintiff:
James G Blakely
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Robert Wards , David M Tatarsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Singley v. Bush et al
as 4:2010cv00660
Plaintiff:
Ferris Gieger Singley, Jr
Defendant:
Dennis Bush, Jon Ozmint and SC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kaminski v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2010cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaminski
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Director of Medical Headquarters SCDC, Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
