Cases 91 - 100 of 244
Venable v. Maricopa County Justice Courts et al
as 2:2019cv04711
Plaintiff:
Jordan Duke Venable
Defendant:
Don Calinder and Maricopa County Justice Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2019cv04520
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Vincent Companaro
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #252218 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04456
Plaintiff:
Woodie Leo Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Jordan, H Pitz, J Silves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores et al v. Grand Canyon Education Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03614
Defendant:
Grand Canyon Education Incorporated, GCU, Grand Canyon University and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Vasquez Palacios, Cesar Geovany Valdes Flores and Minerva Flores Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03402
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Daquita Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Maricopa County Estrella Jail
as 2:2019cv02995
Plaintiff:
Sachet S Rena Jordan
Defendant:
MCSO Estrella Jail and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geer v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv02884
Plaintiff:
Jordan Michele Geer
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heiger v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02545
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jordan Heiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01403
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Frances Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00987
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ann Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.