Cases 91 - 100 of 854
MISTRAL AVIATION, LLC v. BIRCH HILL REAL ESTATE LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81940
Plaintiff:
MISTRAL AVIATION, LLC
Defendant:
BIRCH HILL REAL ESTATE LLC, ELLSWORTH REAL ESTATE LLC, EG REAL ESTATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03607
Plaintiff:
JASON DONNAY LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03448
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LANE MCCALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHIMMIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
JASON LANE SHIMMIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc et al
as 3:2023cv10527
Plaintiff:
Susan Lane
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gerow v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2022cv02977
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, City of Phoenix, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Fernandez v. Miranda et al
as 3:2022cv01345
Plaintiff:
Luis Fernandez
Defendant:
Arturo Miranda, E. Lane and C. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 8:2022cv02951
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lane
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01350
Plaintiff:
LANE NELSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
