Cases 91 - 100 of 348
Victory Solutions Ltd. v. Sure Fit Home Decor LLC et al
as 1:2020cv05837
Plaintiff:
Victory Solutions Ltd.
Defendant:
Protect-A-Bed, LLC, Centre Lane Partners, LLC and Sure Fit Home Decor LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Harding et al
as 2:2020cv02272
Defendant:
Marcie Miller, Vermilion County Sheriffs Department, Shelley Harding and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02228
Plaintiff:
Dustin M Lane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Bullitt Mobile LLC
as 1:2020cv04218
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Bullitt Mobile LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Motorola Solutions Inc.
as 1:2020cv03600
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions Inc. and Motorola Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MTDB Corp. v. American Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv03127
Plaintiff:
MTDB Corp. and MTDB Corp. doing business as Striker Lanes
Defendant:
American Automobile Insurance Company and American Automobile Insurance Company doing business as Fireman's Fund/Allianz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lane v. Liberty Mutual et al
as 2:2020cv02095
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual and David H Long
Plaintiff:
Dustin M Lane
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Anderson v. Miles et al
as 1:2020cv02088
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Anderson
Defendant:
Shewin Milep, Frederick Lane, Karen Rabideau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Lane
as 4:2020cv04076
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jesus Sanchez
Respondent:
Timothy Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gakuba v. Swells et al
as 3:2020cv00277
Defendant:
Swells, Matthew Swells, Kimberly Birch and others
Plaintiff:
Gakuba and Peter Gakuba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
