Cases 91 - 100 of 490
Incorrectly Filed
as 2:2021cv00003
Defendant:
DR. CARLOS MEDINA and NUESTRA CLINICA DEL VALLE, INC
Plaintiff:
EDGAR LIPTON BRITT and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Britt v. MEDINA et al
as 7:2021cv00009
Plaintiff:
Edgar Lipton Britt
Defendant:
NUESTRA CLINICA DEL VALLE, INC, MD CARLOS MEDINA, Carlos Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Garza v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2020cv01406
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Randy Brown, Chief William McManus and others
Plaintiff:
Rolando Ariel Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2020cv03773
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Courtney Manuel Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03347
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Medina v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv03280
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Medina
Defendant:
AB/FH DFW Property LLC, Hyatt Corporation A Delaware Corporation doing business as Hyatt Regency DFW, The Services Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FILING ERROR
as 1:2020cv00913
Plaintiff:
Casey Fox, Nancy Fox and Fox Lake Ranch LLC
Defendant:
Medina Lake TX Property Associates, LLC, First American Commercial Property Group-Austin, LLC and BNP Paribas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox, et al v. Medina Lake TX Property Associates, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv01052
Plaintiff:
Casey Fox, Nancy Fox and Fox Lake Ranch LLC
Defendant:
Medina Lake TX Property Associates, LLC, First American Commercial Property Group-Austin, LLC and BNP Paribas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zapata Sanchez v. The City of Hondo, Texas et al
as 5:2020cv00989
Defendant:
Medina County, The City of Hondo, Texas and Rube Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Ricky Zapata Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00727
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
