Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 601
Xiong et al v. MERS-Morgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv02647
Plaintiff: Ying Xiong and Choua Vue
Defendant: EverBank , FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Lang, et al v. Aurora Loan Services, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kevin M. Murphy, Kathleen K. Murphy, James L. Lang and others
Defendant - Appellee: Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Aurora Bank FSB, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Mark Gerdes v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2983
Plaintiff - Appellant: Mark Gerdes
Defendant - Appellee: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Bank of America, N.A, Successor BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Mortgage Electronic Registration System and others
Lynch v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02971
Plaintiff: Tamara Lynch
Defendant: Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC , Merscorp, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Perez et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv02437
Plaintiff: Rene Perez and Maria Perez
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and MERSCORP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jon Ethridge, et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 13-2143
Plaintiff - Appellant: JON ETHRIDGE and RENEE D. ETHRIDGE
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INCORPORATED, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., MERSCORP, INC. and others
Portillo et al v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv02370
Plaintiff: Dario Portillo and Blanca Portillo
Defendant: HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. , MERSCORP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis Hertel, et al v. Mtg. Elec. Regis. Sys., Inc., et al
as 13-2109
Plaintiff: CURTIS HERTEL, Register of Deeds and Representative of Ingham County, as Class Representative of all 83 counties in the State of Michigan; personal representative of Ingham, County of, Ingham County and NANCY HUTCHINS, Register of Deeds and Representative of Branch County, as Class Representative of all 83 counties in the State of Michigan; personal representative of Branch, County of, Branch, County Of
Interested Party - Appellant: DANIEL P. MARSH and WILLIAM E. MAXWELL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., MERSCORP, INC., JEANE M. KIVI and others
Intervenor - Appellee: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Curtis Hertel, et al v. Mtg. Elec. Regis. Sys., Inc., et al
as 13-2108
Plaintiff - Appellant: CURTIS HERTEL, Register of Deeds and Representative of Ingham County, as Class Representative of all 83 counties in the State of Michigan; personal representative of Ingham, County of, Ingham County and NANCY HUTCHINS, Register of Deeds and Representative of Branch County, as Class Representative of all 83 counties in the State of Michigan; personal representative of Branch, County of, Branch, County Of
Defendant - Appellee: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., MERSCORP, INC., JEANE M. KIVI and others
Intervenor - Appellee: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Pruss v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01447
Plaintiff: Craig Pruss
Defendant: Bank of America NA , A+ Mortgage Inc, Countrywide Bank FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?