Cases 91 - 100 of 141
JOHNSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2017cv01567
Plaintiff:
BYAER JOHNSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, STEVEN JOHNSON, D. MILES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LERBU TRUCKING, LLC v. XPO LAST MILE, INC.
as 2:2017cv01342
Defendant:
XPO LAST MILE, INC.
Plaintiff:
LERBU TRUCKING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gallow et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00790
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Plaintiff:
Mary Gallow , Tammy Abell , Diana Ahlbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Starks et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Farrah Starks , Tonya Hill , Joyce Sowles and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MILES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07147
Plaintiff:
GORDON L MILES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
JABRANI v. MILES ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02620
Plaintiff:
KAIS JABRANI
Defendant:
MILES ENTERPRISES, INC. , JMRMJ PIZZA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NEUMANN et al v. DETAR et al
as 3:2016cv01317
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY P. NEUMANN and BROEGE, NEUMANN, FISCHER & SHAVER, LLC
Respondent:
RICHARD A. DETAR and MILES STOCKBRIDGE, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
MILES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00787
Plaintiff:
ANESHA MILES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
