Cases 91 - 100 of 140
Perez v. Bronco Mexican Restaurant No 1 Inc et al
as 7:2014cv04586
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Bronco Mexican Restaurant No 1 Inc , Bronco Mexican Restaurant No 2 Inc , Bronco Mexican Restaurant No 3 Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Perez v. Sanchez et al
as 6:2014cv04326
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Jose Jesus Sanchez, Ramon Vega, Rafael Arroyo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mazal Azzam et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02340
Plaintiff:
Mazal Azzam , Shirley Stevens , Anita Patel and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Theresa Medina et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02300
Plaintiff:
Theresa Medina , Diane Franzoia , Ozzie Bidar and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEREZ v. PFIZER INC.
as 2:2014cv02182
Plaintiff:
Anita D. Perez
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Slammin Sam LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01375
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Slammin Sam LLC, Charleston Hospitality Group Inc and Osama Mustafa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Leraaen et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv01359
Plaintiff:
Myra Leraaen , Elvenia Blair , Nancy Tatum and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Pancho Villa of Gaffney Inc et al
as 7:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Pancho Villa of Gaffney Inc and Juan S Zarrabal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bonds v. Georgetown County Detention Center et al
as 8:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bonds
Defendant:
Georgetown County Detention Center, A Lane Cribb, Michael A Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
