Cases 91 - 100 of 525
Lawhon v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2016cv03732
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Lawhon
Defendant:
Pursuant Health and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cross_defendant:
Pursuant Health
Cross_claimant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03715
Plaintiff:
Elouise Phillips
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv03029
Plaintiff:
Flora Phillips
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pointer et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02747
Plaintiff:
Melissa Pointer and Phillip Pointer
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WC Hydraulics, LLC v. Phillips Machine Service, Inc.
as 5:2016cv02691
Plaintiff:
WC Hydraulics, LLC
Defendant:
Phillips Machine Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02182
Plaintiff:
Ella A. Phillips and Robert E. Phillips
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01716
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gordon and Phillip Gordon
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webb et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01543
Plaintiff:
Karin Webb and Phillip Brooks Webb
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vitrano v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas Phillip Vitrano
Defendant:
Charles Samuels , Jr., J.F. Caraway, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16471
Plaintiff:
Ruby Ann Phillips and Chris Phillips
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
